Amd radeon hd 6300m series text5/1/2023 And I'm pretty sure the hard drive will be much faster than the one in your current system, which will improve load times AND mutitasking.WITHOUT THE SLIGHTEST bit of noise, AMD has – well, we can’t really call it launch, but you get the picture – released its Radeon HD 6300M and 6500M series of mobile GPUs. There's also two half-height x16 expansion slots, just in case you get the need for more video card power. The system is upgradable to 32gb ram, so again I'm looking out for a decade of use out of the system. It's usable at 4gb ram for basic web and office work (just don't expect to have a ton of tabs open in your web browser). You can just get the 4GB now, and upgrade later. The refurbished system I linked includes a video card as powerful as that GT710, and Windows 7 included (still supported), and a processor several times faster than n your P4! And it's only $20 extra to have them preinstall Windows 10, which will be supported for at least ten more years. I can't understand why you're spending $40 on a bandage, when you can fix all your problems for the next decade for $90 more. You are processor limited for sure, and possibly memory limited. Should I use one of the four cards I have or can I get better performance for my needs by purchasing something else (recommendations). How do the four cards compare to the original? I cant obviously test the bad card and the scores given on this page (55 and 1.72) don't seem to have anything to do with the PT test I ran on the other cards. Which specs are most important to me, memory size (only need 1024x76), memory speed, clock speed, memory technology? Since I am not playing 3D games I assume that 2D performance is more important to me, but why wouldn't a faster card be faster on all? Why do the reported memory sizes differ (ie I "knew" my card to be 256MB but PT web page says 128MB max, AMD Card is marked at 512 on board, but PT reports 1024MB)?īased on my test (below) the NEW Nvidia 7300 was faster on 2D test than the Radeon HD 6300M, but much worse on the 3D tests. Is my assumption about the browsing bottleneck being the GPU correct? Diamond Radeon X1550, PT reports 512MB DDR2, Clock 547 MHZ, Memory clock 270MHZĪccording to the online PT results my old card specs were Max Memory Size: 128MB Core Clock 350 MHz, Memory clock 666 MHz. ATI Radeon X300, PT reports 128MB DDR SGRAM / SD RAM, Clock 324MHZ, memory clock 196MHZĤ. Has a box checked off on the board that says 512MB but PT says 1024MB, HyperMemory, Core clock 650MHZ, Memory clock 400MHZģ. A different looking then blown card Nvidia GEforce 7300 LE, which I thought only had 128MB but PT says 512MB (128MB dedicated), DDR2,Ĭore clock 450MHZ, Memory data rate 1296 MHZĢ. The four cards I have laying around are (PerformanceTest results at bottom of post):ġ. Since my internet speed is 250mbs and the PC has a 1000mbs NIC, 4GB RAM, SSD hard drive, I assume it is the GPU which is choking on these pages. My only complaint with the previous setup was that web pages with a lot of embedded videos or ads would take a long to time to render. I'm also not opposed to buying a new card if these cards are worse then the one that I previously had. I have several old PCI-E cards laying around and was trying to determine which would be the best card to use. The graphics card just blew up (Nvidia GEforce 7300 LE 256MB) and I need to replace it. I have a really old WinXP box which is used for office work (word processing, Quicken, Web browsing, no gaming).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |